we were born equal 这句英文有错么_百度作业帮
we were born equal 这句英文有错么
没错,美国独立宣言中有类似的一句：We hold these truths to be self-evident,that all men are created equal,..形容词equal在这里作主语补足语,从语法上说就是形容词equal修饰了代词we.
你中文表达什么意思呢？如果英文的话，We were born equally.
we were born in equal
你好we were born equal 我们生来平等。句子没问题。~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~祝你学习进步，更上一层楼！不明白请及时追问，满意敬请采纳，O(∩_∩)O谢谢~~
没错、。。。。。。。。。。。。Liberal&Creationism
Created Equal
Liberal Creationism
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights …
Advertisement
Last month, James Watson, the legendary biologist, was condemned and forced into
after claiming that African intelligence wasn't "." "Racist, vicious and ," said the Federation of American Scientists. "," declared the U.S. government's supervisor of genetic research. The New York Times told readers that when Watson implied "that black Africans are less intelligent than whites, he ."
I wish these assurances were true. . Tests do show an IQ deficit, not just for Africans relative to Europeans, but for Europeans relative to Asians. Economic and cultural theories have failed to explain most of the pattern, and there's strong preliminary evidence that part of it is genetic. It's time to prepare for the possibility that equality of intelligence, in the sense of racial averages on tests, will turn out not to be true.
If this suggestion makes you angry—if you find the idea of genetic racial advantages outrageous, socially corrosive, and unthinkable—you're not the first to feel that way. Many Christians are going through a similar struggle over evolution. Their faith in human dignity rests on a literal belief in Genesis. To them, evolution isn' it's a threat to their whole value system. As William Jennings Bryan
during the Scopes trial, evolution meant elevating "supposedly superior intellects," "eliminating the weak," "paralyzing the hope of reform," jeopardizing "the doctrine of brotherhood," and undermining "the sympathetic activities of a civilized society."
The same values—equality, hope, and brotherhood—are under scientific threat today. But this time, the threat is racial genetics, and the people struggling with it are liberals.
Evolution forced Christians to bend or break. They could insist on the Bible's literal truth and deny the facts, as Bryan did. Or they could seek a subtler account of creation and human dignity. Today, the dilemma is yours. You can try to reconcile evidence of racial differences with a more sophisticated understanding of equality and opportunity. Or you can fight the evidence and hope it doesn't break your faith.
I'm for reconciliation. Later this week, I'll make that case. But if you choose to fight the evidence, . Among white Americans, the average IQ, as of a decade or so ago, was 103. Among Asian-Americans, it was 106. Among Jewish Americans, it was 113. Among Latino Americans, it was 89. Among African-Americans, it was 85. Around the world, studies find the same general pattern: whites 100, East Asians 106, sub-Sarahan Africans 70. One IQ table shows 113 in Hong Kong, 110 in Japan, and 100 in Britain. White populations in Australia, Canada, Europe, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United States score closer to one another than to the worldwide black average. It's been that way for at least a century.
Remember, these are averages, and all groups overlap. You can't deduce an individual's intelligence from her ethnicity. The only thing you can reasonably infer is that anyone who presumes to rate your IQ based on the color of your skin is probably dumber than you are.
So, what should we make of the difference in averages?
We don't like to think IQ is mostly inherited. But we've all known families who are smarter than others. Twin and sibling studies, which can sort genetic from environmental factors, suggest more than half the variation in IQ scores is genetic. A task force report from the
indicates it might be even higher. The report doesn't conclude that genes explain racial gaps in IQ. But the tests on which racial gaps are biggest happen to be the tests on which genes, as measured by comparative sibling performance, exert the biggest influence.
How could genes cause an IQ advantage? The simplest pathway is head size. I thought head measurement had been discredited as Eurocentric pseudoscience. I was wrong. In fact, it's been . On average, Asian-American kids have bigger brains than white American kids, who in turn have bigger brains than black American kids. This is true even though the order of body size and weight runs in the other direction. The pattern holds true throughout the world and persists at death, as measured by brain weight.
According to twin studies, 50 percent to 90 percent of variation in head size and brain volume is genetic. And when it comes to IQ, size matters. The old science of head measurements found a 20 percent correlation of head size with IQ. The new science of MRI finds at least a 40 percent correlation of brain size with IQ. One analysis calculates that brain size could easily account for five points of the black-white IQ gap.
I know, it sounds crazy. But if you approach the data from other directions, you get the same results. The more black and white scores differ on a test, the more performance on that test correlates with head size and "g," a measure of the test's emphasis on general intelligence. You can debate the reality of g, but you can't debate the reality of head size. And when you compare black and white kids who score the same on IQ tests, their average difference in head circumference is zero.
Scientists have already
that influence brain size and vary by continent. Whether these play a role in racial IQ gaps, . But we should
this research, because any genetic hypothesis about intelligence ought to be clarified and tested.
Critics think IQ tests are relative—i.e., they measure fitness for success in our society, not in other societies. "In a hunter-gatherer society, IQ will still be important, but if a hunter cannot shoot straight, IQ will not bring food to the table,"
psychologist . "In a warrior society … physical prowess may be equally necessary to stay alive." It's a good point, but it bolsters the case for a genetic theory. Nature isn't stupid. If Africans, Asians, and Europeans evolved different genes, the reason is that their respective genes were suited to their respective environments.
In fact, there's a mountain of evidence that differential evolution has left each population with a balance of traits that could be advantageous or disadvantageous, depending on circumstances. The
is long and intricate. On average, compared with whites, blacks mature more quickly in the womb, are born earlier, and develop teeth, strength, and dexterity earlier. They sit, crawl, walk, and dress themselves earlier. They reach sexual maturity faster, and they have better eyesight. On each of these measures, East Asians lag whites and blacks. In exchange, East Asians get longer lives and bigger brains.
How this happened isn't clear. Everyone agrees that the three populations separated 40,000 to 100,000 years ago. Even
of racial IQ genetics accept the idea that through natural selection, environmental differences may have caused abilities such as distance running to become more common in some populations than in others. Possibly, genes for cognitive complexity became so crucial in some places that nature favored them over genes for developmental speed and vision. If so, fitness for today's world is mostly dumb luck. If we lived in a savannah, kids programmed to mature slowly and grow big brains would be toast. Instead, we live in a world of zoos, supermarkets, pediatricians, pharmaceuticals, and information technology. Genetic advantages, in other words, are culturally created.
Not that that's much consolation if you're stuck in the 21st century with a low IQ. Tomorrow we'll look at some of the arguments against the genetic theory.
Mr. Runner-Up
It’s not that Sen. Marco Rubio can’t win. It’s that he’s almost no one’s first choice for the top job.
Jamelle Bouie
Cucumber&and&Banana&Get Queer Life Right
J. Bryan Lowder
The XX Factor
New York A.G. to Investigate Employers Who Keep Low-Wage Workers “On Call”
Amanda Marcotte
The “How Does a Family Business Work?” Transcript
Read what Adam Davidson asked a mother-and-son duo about making neckerchews and potty seats.
Adam Davidson
The Mysteries of Carcosa Get a Tad More Mundane in True Dadtective
Sharan Shetty
Future Tense
DARPA Researchers Plan Software That Will Run for Hundreds of Years Without Upgrades
Lily Hay Newman
Bad Astronomy
For Wyoming, Climate Change Is Now
Phil Plait
Sports Nut
The Internet’s Favorite Exercise
Is the box jump a worthwhile training technique or just a fancy party trick?
Alan SiegelAll men are created equally.的用法和样例：
We still hold to the belief that all men are created equal.
我们仍然坚信这一真理:人人生而平等。
His theory is based on the hypothesis that all men are created equal.
他的理论基于人人平等的前提。
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.
我们认为这些真理是不可理喻的，人生来就是平等的。
We hold these trues to be self-evident,that all men are created equal!
（我们认为这些真理不言而喻：人类生来皆平等。）
The Declaration, with its eloquent assertion @all Men are created equal@, is equally beloved by the American people.
这个宣言依靠感人至深的主张“所有人都是平等的”，受到广大美国人的拥护。
All men are created equally.的海词问答与网友补充：
相关词典网站：Quotations by Subject
(1908 - 1972), 'Black Power: A Form of Godly Power,' 1967
(1879 - 1955)
(1894 - 1963)
(384 BC - 322 BC), Politics
(384 BC - 322 BC)
(1689 - 1755)
(1689 - 1755)
(1903 - 1950), "Animal Farm"
(1906 - 1975)
(~100 BC), Moral Sayings, First Century B.C.
(1694 - 1778)
Showing quotations 1 to 13 of 13 quotations in our collections
Previous Subject:
Next Subject:From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Virginia Declaration of Rights is a document drafted in 1776 to proclaim the inherent
of men, including the right to rebel against "inadequate" government. It influenced a number of later documents, including the
(1776), the
(1789), and the 's
was the principal author of the Virginia Declaration of Rights.
The Declaration was adopted unanimously by the
on June 12, 1776 as a separate document from the
which was later adopted on June 29, 1776. In 1830, the Declaration of Rights was incorporated within the Virginia State Constitution as Article I, but even before that Virginia's Declaration of Rights stated that it was '"the basis and foundation of government" in Virginia. A slightly updated version may still be seen in Virginia's Constitution, making it legally in effect to this day.
Ten articles were initially drafted by
May 20-26, 1776; three other articles were added in committee, seen in the original draft in the handwriting of , but the author is unknown.
later proposed liberalizing the article on religious freedom, but the larger Virginia Convention made further changes. It was later amended by Committee and the entire Convention, including the addition of a section on the right to uniform government (Section 14).
persuaded the Convention to delete a section that would have prohibited , arguing that ordinary laws could be ineffective against some terrifying offenders.
proposed the line "when they enter into a state of society" which allowed slave holders to support the declaration of universal rights which would be understood not to apply to slaves as they were not part of civil society.
Mason based his initial draft on the rights of citizens described in earlier works such as the
(1689), and the writings of
and the Declaration can be considered the first modern Constitutional protection of individual rights for citizens of North America. It rejected the notion of privileged political classes or hereditary offices such as the members of Parliament and House of Lords described in the English Bill of Rights.
The Declaration consists of sixteen articles on the subject of which rights "pertain to [the people of Virginia]...as the basis and foundation of Government." In addition to affirming the inherent nature of rights to life, liberty, property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety, the Declaration both describes a view of Government as the servant of the people, and enumerates its separation of powers into the administration, legislature, and judiciary. Thus, the document is unusual in that it not only prescribes legal rights, but it also describes moral principles upon which a government should be run.
Articles 1-3 address the subject of rights and the relationship between government and the governed. Article 1 states that "all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights of which . . . they cannot deprive or di namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety," a statement later made internationally famous in the first paragraph of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, as "we hold these truths to be self-evident, that , and are endowed by their Creator with certain , that among these are ."
Articles 2 and 3 note the revolutionary concept that "all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people..." and that "whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the ." This latter concept effectively asserted the right of the people of Virginia to revolt against the .
Article 4 asserts the equality of all citizens, rejecting the notion of privileged political classes or hereditary offices - another criticism of British institutions such as the
and the privileges of the : "no set of men, are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community, but in consideratio which, not being descendible, neither ought the offices of magistrate, legislator, or judge be hereditary."
Articles 5 and 6 recommend the principles of
and free elections, "frequent, certain, and regular" of executives and legislators: "That the legislative and executive powers of the state should be separate and distinct and, that the members of the two first...should, at fixed periods, be reduced to a private station, return into that body from which they were originally taken...by frequent, certain, and regular elections."
Articles 7-16 propose restrictions on the powers of the government, declaring the government should not have the power of suspending or executing laws, "without consent of the representatives of the people"; establishing the legal rights to be "confronted with the accusers and witnesses, to call for evidence in his favor, and to a speedy trial by an impartial jury of his vicinage," and to prevent a citizen from being "compelled to give evidence against himself." protections against "", baseless , and the guarantees of a trial by jury, ,
("all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion"), and "the proper, natural, and safe defence of a free state" rested in a well regulated militia composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, that standing armies in time of peace, should be avoided as
Article 8 protects a person against "being deprived of his liberty except by the " which later evolved into the
clause in the federal Bill of Rights.
is the first ever codification of the right to a free press and was an important precursor to the .
The following is the complete text of the Virginia Declaration of Rights:
A DECLARATION OF RIGHTS made by the representatives of the good people of Virginia, assembled in full and free convention which rights do pertain to them and their posterity, as the basis and foundation of government .
Section 1. That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or di namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.
Section 2. That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, that magistrates are their trustees and servants and at all times amenable to them.
Section 3. That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration. And that, when any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community has an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.
Section 4. That no man, or set of men, is entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community, but in consideratio which, nor being descendible, neither ought the offices of magistrate, legislator, or judge to be hereditary.
Section 5. That the legislative and executive powers of the state should be separate and distinc and that the members of the two first may be restrained from oppression, by feeling and participating the burdens of the people, they should, at fixed periods, be reduced to a private station, return into that body from which they were originally taken, and the vacancies be supplied by frequent, certain, and regular elections, in which all, or any part, of the former members, to be again eligible, or ineligible, as the laws shall direct.
Section 6. That elections of members to serve as representatives of the people, in assem and that all men, having sufficient evidence of permanent common interest with, and attachment to, the community, have the right of suffrage and cannot be taxed or deprived of their property for public uses without their own consent or that of their representatives so elected, nor bound by any law to which they have not, in like manner, assented for the public good.
Section 7. That all power of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, by any authority, without consent of the representatives of the people, is injurious to their rights and ought not to be exercised.
Section 8. That in all capital or criminal prosecutions a man has a right to demand the cause and nature of his accusation, to be confronted with the accusers and witnesses, to call for evidence in his favor, and to a speedy trial by an impartial jury of twelve men of his vicinage, without whose unanimous consent he ca nor can he be compelled to give evid that no man be deprived of his liberty except by the law of the land or the judgment of his peers.
Section 9. That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Section 10. That general warrants, whereby an officer or messenger may be commanded to search suspected places without evidence of a fact committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, or whose offense is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are grievous and oppressive and ought not to be granted.
Section 11. That in controversies respecting property, and in suits between man and man, the ancient trial by jury is preferable to any other and ought to be held sacred.
Section 12. That the freedom of the press is one of the great bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained but by despotic governments.
Section 13. That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe def that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as
and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.
Section 14. That the people have a right t and, therefore, that no government separate from or independent of the government of Virginia ought to be erected or established within the limits thereof.
Section 15. That no free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue and by frequent recurrence to fundamental principles.
Section 16. That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not
and therefore all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the di and that it is the mutual duty of all to practise Christian forbearance, love, and charity toward each other. Written by George Mason, and adopted by the Virginia Constitutional Convention on June 12, 1776.
The Virginia Declaration of Rights heavily influenced later documents.
is thought to have drawn on it when he drafted the
in the same month (June 1776).
was also influenced by the Declaration while drafting the
(introduced September 1789, ratified 1791), as was the
in voting the 's
The importance of the Virginia Declaration of Rights is that it was the first constitutional protection of individual rights,[] rather than protecting only members of Parliament or consisting of simple laws that can be changed as easily as passed.
Virginia's western counties cited the Declaration of Rights as a justification for rejecting the state's Ordinance of Secession before the . The delegates to the
argued that under the Declaration of Rights, any change in the form of government had to be approved by a referendum. Since the Secession Convention had not been convened by a referendum, the western counties argued that all of its acts were void. This set in motion the chain of events that ultimately led the western counties to break off as the separate state of .
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. —That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed" —
(July 1776)
"Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions can be founded only on the common utility." —
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (although the Virginia Declaration makes no reference to a "right to keep or bear arms") —
(December 1791)
. Library of Congress 2011.
, Purdie, July 05, 1776 supplement, page 1.
Pittman, R. "" (1955).
Rutland, Robert, editor, The Papers of George Mason (1970), vol. 1 pp. 274-289
Randolph, Edmund. History of Virginia, page 255 (Virginia Historical Society 1970).
, Paul Aron, Colonial Willamsburg and Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2008
Preamble, Virginia Declaration of Rights.
Lieberman, Jethro (1987). The Enduring Constitution: A Bicentennial Perspective. West Publishing Co. p. 28.  .
Article 10
Article 11
Article 12
Article 16
Article 13
Article 12
Mellen, Roger P. "The Origins of a Free Press in Prerevolutionary Virginis, pp. 254-263 (2009).
George Mason (June 12, 1776).
has original text related to this article:
(George Mason's Draft, 20–26 May 1776)
(Committee Draft, 27 May 1776)
(Final Draft, 12 June 1776)
, from the Library of Virginia and the Library of Congress
: Hidden categories: